The rial is not traded on the global currency markets, so an accurate value can't be determined). It fell a further nine percent on Tuesday. According to some Iranian traders, the sharp decline was due, in part, to firm statements from the United States and Israel at the United Nations General Assembly as well as the Iranian central bank's implementation of a new currency exchange on September 24.
According to the chairman of financial trading house Pakzad Consulting Corp, "The sharpening of the rhetoric could lead some to think we're closer to a military strike." He continued that for speculators, "this is a perfect opportunity to make money."
Iran's worsening financial situation has sparked divisions in the Iranian government. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad blamed the crisis on financial authorities for mismanaging currency in a news conference in New York last week. Conversely, on Sunday, a member of the Iranian Parliament's economic commission accused Ahmadenijad of mismanaging the currency market.
Iran's currency has reportedly lost over 80 percent of its value since 2011. Expanded U.S. and EU trade sanctions have resulted in an estimate 45 percent decline in Iranian income from oil exports.
Iran may still be years away from any nuclear-armed missile
By Fredrik Dahl | Reuters 02 October 2012
VIENNA (Reuters) - Iran
already has enough low-enriched uranium for several atomic bombs if
refined to a high degree but it may still be a few years away from being
able to build a nuclear-armed missile if it decided to go down that
path.
Israel's warning last week that Iran will be on the brink of developing a nuclear weapon
by mid-2013 seemed to refer to when it could have a sufficient stock of
higher-grade uranium to make a quick dash to produce a bomb's worth of
weapon-grade material.
But, analysts say,
Tehran would need time also for the technologically complicated task of
fashioning highly refined uranium gas into a nuclear warhead small
enough to fit on a missile - if it opts for such weapons of mass
destruction.
"Maybe they have
all of the equipment ready. Maybe they have played with surrogate
materials. I don't think anyone knows."
"I still think that
we are talking about several years ... before Iran could develop a
nuclear weapon and certainly before they could have a deliverable
nuclear weapon," said Shannon Kile, head of the Nuclear Weapons Project
of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, a think-tank.
A high-level group
of U.S. security experts - including former national security adviser
Zbigniew Brzezinski and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard
Armitage - estimated that Iran would need between one and four months to
produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a single nuclear device.
"Additional time -
up to two years, according to conservative estimates - would be required
for Iran to build a nuclear warhead that would be reliably deliverable
by a missile," they said in a report published last month.
Mark Fitzpatrick, of the International Institute for
Strategic Studies (IISS) think-tank, also said Iran would need at least
two years for assembling a nuclear-tipped missile.
Senior researcher
Greg Jones of the U.S.-based Nonproliferation Policy Education Center
put forward a much quicker breakout scenario for any bomb bid and
suggested a truck rather than a missile could be used for delivery to
target.
NO BREAKOUT WITH JUST ONE BOMB?
But the IISS argued
in a report last year that the weaponisation time must be added to that
required to produce the fissile material to calculate when a usable
bomb could be made.
The United Nations'
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) last year published a report
with a trove of intelligence indicating past, and some possibly
continuing, research activities in Iran that could be relevant for
nuclear weapons.
They included
suspected high explosive experiments and possible work on designing a
device to produce a burst of neutrons for setting off a fission chain
reaction.
Washington still
believes that Iran is not on the verge of having a nuclear bomb and that
it has not made a decision to pursue one, U.S. officials said in
August.
In a speech at the
annual United Nations General Assembly on Thursday, Netanyahu drew a
"red line" on a cartoon bomb just below a label in which Iran was 90
percent along the path to having sufficient weapons-grade material.
Experts put that at
the point when Iran has amassed enough uranium, purified to a fissile
level of 20 percent, that could quickly be enriched further and be used
to produce a bomb.
Worryingly for the
West and Israel, some of that material has been refined to 20 percent,
representing most of the effort involved in reaching potential bomb
material.
Traditionally, about 250 kg is estimated to be needed for a bomb, but some believe less would do.
"It is widely known
that even a first device can be made with much less," the diplomat in
Vienna said. But, "no one breaks out to make one warhead. Estimates vary
but most think three to five warheads is a minimum to be a real nuclear power."
An Israeli official
briefed on the Netanyahu government's Iran strategy told Reuters: "Once
Iran gets its first device, no matter how rudimentary, it's a nuclear
power and a nuclear menace. With that said, we have always noted that,
from this threshold, it would take Iran another two years or so to make a
deployable warhead."
No comments:
Post a Comment